Today is Sunday, February 07, 2016   4:41pm EST

New York's Fracking Phobia

The Wall Street Journal, January 2, 2013  Review and Outlook

Most Americans by now know about the natural gas revolution and its potential. It's become possible through a process called hydraulic fracturing, whereby water and chemicals are used to force previously unrecoverable deposits from shale rock. The technology is bringing new wealth to workers in many states. Except New York. Governor Andrew Cuomo seems content to let the people in the depressed counties of upstate New York watch the rest of the country benefit from fracking.

The state's Department of Environmental Protection is expected to finish an environmental review in February and perhaps issue drilling regulations by the end of that month. Theoretically this would end a four-year moratorium on fracking.

But Mr. Cuomo said recently that he'll have to await word from a newly appointed health review board. His appointees are being cheered by drilling critics, perhaps because they have previously criticized the health risks of fracking. The process of delays gives the strong impression that Mr. Cuomo is looking for a pretext to keep the ban in place. Fracking opponents have vowed to mount legal challenges to any regulatory green light, and the industry is now saying 2013 looks like it will be a lost year in New York.

Fracking was a major issue last year in local elections upstate, where candidates in favor of it trounced those opposed. We doubt residents of these areas are eager for an environmental catastrophe. They've observed that the alleged risks of fracking—such as groundwater contamination—haven't happened as shale drilling boomed in nearby Pennsylvania.

The larger irony is that, in the wake of Hurricane Sandy, Mr. Cuomo is now talking up the risks of climate change. Big-city greens are urging him to spend tens of billions of dollars on levees and other barriers as protection against rising seas. But if the Governor really believes carbon emissions are a major threat, the biggest contribution Mr. Cuomo could make would be to allow fracking.

The more U.S. power plants burn natural gas instead of coal, the less particulate pollution and carbon dioxide are put into the atmosphere. Burning coal puts out about twice the amount of carbon dioxide per raw unit of energy generated. This is simple chemistry based on the hydrogen- carbon ratio of the two energy sources. Add in better turbine technology at newer natural-gas power plants and the efficiency gain is even greater, according to the International Energy Agency.

Last year the U.S. Energy Information Administration reported a remarkable fact: Overall U.S. carbon dioxide emissions—the majority of which come from electricity generation—had fallen to their lowest level in 20 years, some 14% off the peak in 2007. There are upwards of 50 million more energy consumers in the U.S. than there were 20 years ago, so the achievement is all the more impressive.

This didn't happen with command-and-control regulation. Nor have the European countries who signed up to the Kyoto Protocol on climate change made such progress. Their strategy of channeling taxpayer subsidies to wind and solar power has achieved about half the per-capita carbon emissions reduction. U.S. emissions are lower because utilities have responded to the market incentive of cheaper natural gas.

Mr. Cuomo is surely aware of all this. For now the Governor's political read looks to be that New York's upstate economy can sit hostage to the antigrowth energy agenda of wealthy downstate environmentalists.

A version of this article appeared January 2, 2013, on page A12 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: New York's Fracking Phobia.


+2 # Janice L. Miller Monday, January 7th, 2013 @1:26PM
What in God's name is this gov. problem!!!!!
I now seriously think no amount of "facts & science" are going to make any difference to him!!!
Cuomo has been bought, packaged and wrapped up tight! For the life of me, I can no longer tolerate his waffling!
We, as citizens, have every right to sell what belongs to us, namely, the natural gas under our property! WE OWN IT!!!!!
If Cuomo doesn't lift the ban in Feb. or March, why don't we sue HIM for stomping on our constitutional rights, and denying us this financial gain and the ability to gain energy independence!!!
Is there anything we can do, or are we all just talking to a WALL??
THANKS for listening!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
+1 # Keith Yates Wednesday, January 9th, 2013 @9:00PM
those of you landowners who mistakenly think Cuomo will stop pandering to the radical left should remember his track record and pay very close attention to the last paragraph of the above article. HE IS GOING TO LET THE FEB 27 DEADLINE LAPSE.

natural gas drilling and our mineral rights are going into oblivion in NY under this charlatan. he thinks the upstate economy will be saved by yogurt, mediocre wine, and more tourism advertising. this afternoon, for the 3rd year in a row he ignored the elephant in the room, thinking us to too stupid to know the difference; a bunch of hayseeds who can be dismissed as inconsequential to his all-NYC agenda.

the question is: what are we going to do about it?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote

Copyright © 2010-2015

JLCNY is not responsible for the content of linked third-party websites, third-party advertisements, or user posted content. User posted content does not express the opinions of the JLCNY. JLCNY does not endorse any banner advertisements. Advertising on the JLCNY site does not mean that the advertiser endorses the views and opinions of the JLCNY.

Joint Landowners Coalition of NY
PO Box 2839
Binghamton, NY 13902


Toggle Bar